翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Bright green environmentalism
・ Bright Grey
・ Bright Halt railway station
・ Bright Hill MRT Station
・ Bright Hockey Center
・ Bright Horizons Family Solutions
・ Bright House
・ Bright House Field
・ Bright House Networks
・ Bright House Networks Open
・ Bright House Networks Stadium
・ Bright House Sports Network
・ Bright Hub
・ Bright Idea
・ Brigham City Utah Temple
Brigham City v. Stuart
・ Brigham City, Arizona
・ Brigham City, Utah
・ Brigham Hall
・ Brigham House
・ Brigham McCown
・ Brigham municipal election, 2003
・ Brigham municipal election, 2005
・ Brigham municipal election, 2009
・ Brigham railway station
・ Brigham Smoot
・ Brigham Young
・ Brigham Young (disambiguation)
・ Brigham Young (film)
・ Brigham Young and the Mountain Meadows massacre


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Brigham City v. Stuart : ウィキペディア英語版
Brigham City v. Stuart

''Brigham City v. Stuart'', , is a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. The Court ruled that police may enter a home without a warrant if they have an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is or is about to be seriously injured.
The case involved the arrest of four adults seen restraining a juvenile, who punched one of the adults who was restraining him. The trial court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, arguing that the warrantless entry was not supported by exigent circumstances; the Utah Court of Appeals and Utah Supreme Court both affirmed the trial court's ruling. However, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case on May 22, 2006.
==Background==
On July 23, 2001, at about 3:00 AM, four Brigham City Police officers were dispatched to a loud house party. Upon going to the front door the officers determined that knocking would not be productive and then made their way down the driveway alongside the house to investigate. Through a slat fence they saw two juveniles consuming alcoholic beverages and entered the backyard, having probable cause to do so. While in the backyard the police officers saw an altercation taking place inside the house, which appeared to be four adults restraining a juvenile. At one point, the juvenile broke free and struck one of the occupants of the residence in the nose with his hand.
Two officers opened the screen door and "hollered" to identify themselves, but were unnoticed by the occupants. After entering the house, one officer shouted again to identify himself, this time alerting the occupants. The occupants then became upset at the presence of the officers in the residence without permission. The officers arrested the adults and charged them with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, disorderly conduct, and intoxication. The defendants filed a motion to suppress with the trial court. The trial court sided with the defendants, and the city twice appealed to the Utah Court of Appeals and the Utah Supreme Court, which both affirmed the trial court's ruling.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Brigham City v. Stuart」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.